Marc Portier dijo: > well, I do think it does make sense to go for wi:label > > Thinking about it in some abstract terms, we could look at the wd-file > as some kind of a class definition, with all of its declared fields as > some kind of member-variable declarations
The decision is hard to take. I thought the definition file is related to a form definition. Under this context it is correct to have an accesskey related to the label. > however, this 'label' and 'accesskey' stuff rather takes up the > equivalent role of 'static' variables that are shared across all > instances of the same class. Another thing is a general datatype repository (similiar like the one in XReports). I thought it is a good idea too, but it must be just as a helper to avoid is write the same datatypes over and over. > hm, just a way to look at it I guess? :-D > > > <snip topic="more agreement on wi:accesskey inside wi:label"/> I prefer wd:accesskey inside wd:label. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
