On 23 Nov 2003, at 22:31, Steven Noels wrote:
On Nov 21, 2003, at 9:12 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
But I would suggest to ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this before we include any example/code/tutorial/anything that is covered by that.
I agree that the license seems harmless enough. But I also agree with Antonio that this smells funny to me: double checking with the ASF tops doesn't hurt.
WDYT?
I honestly don't know - I don't want to bore licensing@, though. http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/11/19/OfficeSchemas seems kinda reassuring as well.
I'll do it then.
-- Stefano.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
