Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > Unico Hommes wrote: > > > > The Processor currently is already available to a > ProcessingNode from > > the Context so a ProcessingNode implementing > Contextualizable will be > > able to get to the EnvironmentHelper via that route. > > > Ah, ok, so what do you think of using that then? > I just noticed that the key for the processor is just > "treeprocessor", what do you think of using a more qualified > name like org.apache.cocoon.Processor or the name of the > implementation? >
Yes, that was still a TODO and also to make it a public constant somewhere. I never seem to be able to make up my about where to best put these things :-) So if you have an idea about it go ahead. Unico
