Unico Hommes wrote: > I am just thinking whether it'd be worth a separate protocol > something like forward://something ? > Yes, I thought of this as well. Unfortunately we have to many hardcoded places, where against the protocol name "cocoon:" is tested. So if we provide a new protocol we have to change all those places as well.
And we have to come up with a good name, as <map:generate src="forward://something"/> might look at little bit strange :) Carsten
