Leo Sutic wrote: > > > From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > So, if I understand you correctly, the only difference is > that I can > > get an exception that I wasn't prepared to get when using Avalon. > > Yep, that's pretty much it. > > > If that's try then I don't see any reason why this wouldn't > work with > > using the Avalon interfaces - I'm just speaking of the > interfaces not > > the implementation! > > It will work, but the thing is that people have started > assuming that some things will work in certain ways. > > So while the interfaces will work in practice, they won't in > theory, since there are some semantics that are gone. > Okay, I see - so as long as I don't reload a block, it's pretty much the same.
Thanks, Leo! Carsten
