On Wed, 26 May 2004, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > On 26 May 2004, at 10:17, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > > Some things that come to my mind for 2.2: > > - first finished version of CForms. > > - deprecate XSP (and provide a viable alternative) many people talking about "deprecate XSP" but can i ask something?
is any better alternative to produce xml quering databases? i think that until now the way ESQL-->XML--> any tranfrormation --> .. has no better alternative --stavros > > - cleaning up the caching/store mess > > - remove deprecated blocks etc. > > I like it, I like it! :-) (yep, twice). > > Starting on 2.2 to bring the current 2.1 to a level of complete > solidity of contracts and features is, IMVHO, an optimal idea, and puts > us in the position (also) to start using the Linux-like versioning > scheme. > > 2.2 will be our "stable" tree, and all crummy development (real blocks, > and you name it) can easily happen in 2.3 which will always be kept as > "unstable", to end up with a 2.4 release! :-P > > Now, the only thing I'm horrified about is that voice about a BRANCH in > our current CVS (aaarrrrggggghhhh)... I'd say we clear out the 2.2 CVS > repo and do a clean re-import of 2.1.5, or switch to Subversion now, > but purlllease don't add any branch in the tree... > > If someone wants, I can rename the 2.2 repository into a 2.3 straight > away (so that we ain't going to lose anything)... > > Pier > >
