Il giorno 28/lug/04, alle 14:15, Carsten Ziegeler ha scritto:
But let not implementation details (or technics) drive the syntax. It is more important to have a good sitemap language than to have a clean and small implementation.
I beg to disagree. I'm perfectly comfortable with the current sitemap syntax (snide comments about "pointy brackets" aside) and I don't think Cocoon users (i.e. people who should know XML well) should be scared by it.
It's the implementation that is bugging me: 74 classes are not a small package. Can we do it with less? I hope so.
Ugo
-- Ugo Cei - http://beblogging.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
