On 16 Oct 2004, at 13:31, Ugo Cei wrote:
Il giorno 16/ott/04, alle 13:28, Carsten Ziegeler ha scritto:
For a long time I was against writing our own container as I saw it simply as a waist of time/resources. But after just talking five minutes with Pier at the GT, I changed my opinion :) (Sometimes Pier can be really convincing).
Pier should have spent another five minutes trying to convince me ;-).
I spent more time with you than with Carsten, Ugo... Probably some people have a wider perception of live which helps them understanding better other people's position.
As I personally need the kernel, I will personally invest some more time into it, Cocoon or not (frankly, I could care less at this point).
I think that the current kernel code is wrong, as it's based on implementation of interfaces a-la Avalon, and you showed me a way to embrace the new idea of however-you-call-it component injection or POJO container. That's a must, and I want that in. Class loader isolation is another must.
And that said, I close this whole discussion as I think it's entirely pointless, I'll let Stefano re-iterate why class loading isolation is required to achieve blocks polymorphism.
Pier
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
