Thanks for jogging my memory Sylvain. Yes, the rule was followed. As much as I'd like the actual source, the name does allow me to get it myself.
BTW - weren't the rules for release numbering, the guarantees about compatibility as well as how snapshots would be named supposed to be on the website? I'm not seeing it and don't know where else to look. Ralph Sylvain Wallez said: > Antonio Gallardo wrote: > Nope. You committed that unreleased version for a valid reason and you > followed that naming rule that allows to find the corresponding sources > if ever we have to refer to them. > > So from my POV, you did it well, except that the commit message should > have been more explicit, especially before being offline for a while :-) > > Sylvain
