Stefano Mazzocchi dijo: > Niclas Hedhman wrote: > >> On Saturday 16 October 2004 04:55, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: >> >> >>>Because they have been around forever *AND* they don't change their >>>contracts overnight. >> >> >> Your talk is not entirely reflected by the actions of the community. I >> just >> did a svn up on the 2.1 branch; >> >> A lib/endorsed/xalan-2.6.1-dev-20041008T0304.jar >> D lib/endorsed/xalan-2.6.0.jar >> >> Why does the 2.1 branch require a timestamped/snapshot version of Xalan, >> if >> everything is so fine and dandy with it? > > Damn, I am *NOT*. I missed that. We must not depend on timestamped jars > for such important dependencies. > > Antonio?
Hi: I think this mail could answer: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=109822205028606&w=2 >> Antonio makes the following motivation in the commit message; >> "Update xalan to 2.6.1-dev-20041008T0304" > > Yeah, that's useless. <shrug/> I agree. But, What can I do? It was at hackathon with a lot of interesting people speaking around! ;-) Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
