Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
One concern is to come up with a unified template language. This implies:
1) understanding the features we want (and we don't want!) from a template language
2) come up with a syntax
3) implement it
Another and completely separate concern is how to factor out existing bits so that #3 is easier.
You are attacking #3 before attacking #1 and #2 and that's why everybody here is feeling frustration: there is no consensus on #1
I don't think so. There were tons of mails and IMHO we agreed on a list of features (maybe a final summary is missing)
I would be very helpful if we could agree on the above two points with a vote (and a summary, of course) before moving on.
-- Stefano.
