On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:06:14 +0100, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip>other loggers</snip> > > > and it looks like -1 on UGLI from Torsten. > > Well, I doubt I have to give a -1 with > the given facts... :-P
What's to stop everyone from continuing to just construct the Strings like they do today and not use the UGLI parameter substitution? Isn't the fact that it can do substitution on up to two parameters just the equivalent of some extra convenience methods? Or is there something else I missed? -- Peter Hunsberger
