Antonio Gallardo wrote: > > Perhaps telling to replace with log4j was not good. We can change it with > whatever else, but I don't want to have a non-suported jar in our distro. > Yes, but there are only a few possibilities that make sense: log4j, commons logging, jdk14 - we can still support all three but need to decide for a default one.
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
