The packages haven't been changed so far. But this would definitely
have to be considered whether we would want to take on the package
renaming right now.
The minimum JDK for 1.0 was 1.3, although it isn't clear that that was
correct. The minimum JDK for 2.0 has already been changed to 1.4 since
some of the code actually required that version to run.
Ralph
On Aug 19, 2009, at 7:24 AM, James Carman wrote:
Are they going to change the package name?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Ralph Goers<ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
> wrote:
Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4. VFS 2.0 has
not been
released and the developers are considering making the minimum
version JDK
5. We are interested in getting feedback from the community however
before
this change is made. So please respond with your thoughts on this.
Ralph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
