Hi Ralph, +1 on Java 5.
Ralph Goers wrote at Mittwoch, 19. August 2009 16:34: > The packages haven't been changed so far. But this would definitely > have to be considered whether we would want to take on the package > renaming right now. > > The minimum JDK for 1.0 was 1.3, although it isn't clear that that was > correct. The minimum JDK for 2.0 has already been changed to 1.4 since > some of the code actually required that version to run. as Niall already pointed out, it depends whether 2.0 is binary compatible or not. Generics do not necessarily break compatibility. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
