> Well, if you're going to make a jump, why go to something that's EOSL very > soon?
For me, JDK 1.6 would be fine too. But, I'd say this is just a minor issue as the main things one will notice (generics, enhanced for syntax) are there with JDK 1.5. Are there any API changes critical for VFS to use? I don't think so. The next big jump VFS might see will be JDK 1.7 as then they come with a pluggable file provider [1] thingy too. We will see, how VFS fits there. In fact, I think VFS3 will provide just filesystem providers for JDK 1.7 - don't know if they can deal with layered filesystems though. Ciao, Mario [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/nio/javadoc/java/nio/file/FileSystem.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
