On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Dave Brosius <dbros...@apache.org> wrote: > I'm all for it. But there needs to be a decision which seems clear cut to me. > There is code in the code base (by accident--i suppose) now that requires > 1.5. Previously we didn't have that requirement, so pushing out a release > means raising the minimum to 1.5. My vote is lets do it two both. But > everyone should be clear about this decision. Do we call it BCEL 6 because of > this?dave ----- Original Message -----From: "Martin von Gagern" > >;mar...@von-gagern.net
Did existing APIs change, or is the Java 5 requirement an implementation detail? As I recall our policy in Commons is that an upgrade to the required Java version does not in and of itself require a major version bump so long as the code remains binary compatible. Matt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
