If we can agree that BCEL will have a minimum requirement of 1.5 for the
next version, then we should probably actually use 1.5 throughout on
purpose, rather than by accident. I'd be happy to participate in making
these changes. Can we vote on that part of it at least, so that work
could start?
[ ] +1, agreed
[ ] +0, ok, but don't care
[ ] -1, don't agree, with reason
On 07/18/2011 12:56 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
I'm all for it.
I say what I've said all this time when questions like this came up.
We need testers! There has been quite few changes. Just releasing
without some people spending some time ...or telling us "yes, trunk
works for me!" I am still not comfortable with.
But there needs to be a decision which seems clear cut to me. There is code in
the code base (by accident--i suppose) now that requires 1.5. Previously we
didn't have that requirement, so pushing out a release means raising the
minimum to 1.5. My vote is lets do it two both. But everyone should be clear
about this decision. Do we call it BCEL 6 because of this?
Actually that might help with the above changes, too.
+1 for calling it 6.0
...and if we get at least 3 people saying "yes, trunk works for me you
also get my +1 for a release.
Although there still might be some work in bugzilla that has
accumulated over time.
cheers,
Torsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
