On Jul 19, 2011, at 0:04, Dave Brosius <dbros...@apache.org> wrote: > If we can agree that BCEL will have a minimum requirement of 1.5 for the next > version, then we should probably actually use 1.5 throughout on purpose, > rather than by accident. I'd be happy to participate in making these changes. > Can we vote on that part of it at least, so that work could start? > > [ ] +1, agreed > [ ] +0, ok, but don't care > [ ] -1, don't agree, with reason >
+1 Gary > > On 07/18/2011 12:56 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote: >>> I'm all for it. >> I say what I've said all this time when questions like this came up. >> We need testers! There has been quite few changes. Just releasing >> without some people spending some time ...or telling us "yes, trunk >> works for me!" I am still not comfortable with. >> >>> But there needs to be a decision which seems clear cut to me. There is code >>> in the code base (by accident--i suppose) now that requires 1.5. Previously >>> we didn't have that requirement, so pushing out a release means raising the >>> minimum to 1.5. My vote is lets do it two both. But everyone should be >>> clear about this decision. Do we call it BCEL 6 because of this? >> Actually that might help with the above changes, too. >> >> +1 for calling it 6.0 >> >> ...and if we get at least 3 people saying "yes, trunk works for me you >> also get my +1 for a release. >> Although there still might be some work in bugzilla that has >> accumulated over time. >> >> cheers, >> Torsten >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
