On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:51 PM, sebb wrote:

> On 7 March 2012 01:43, James Carman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I still think it should be renamed, but I think I lost that battle.
> 
> Given the "release" by Solr, perhaps now would be a good time to
> revisit that discussion.
> 
> It would solve any package name clashes without needing to call it
> csv2 or whatever.
> 

Yeah. How about Commons Solr.

not serious of course.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to