On 7 March 2012 07:04, Jörg Schaible <[email protected]> wrote: > Ralph Goers wrote: > >> >> On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:51 PM, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 7 March 2012 01:43, James Carman <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I still think it should be renamed, but I think I lost that battle. >>> >>> Given the "release" by Solr, perhaps now would be a good time to >>> revisit that discussion. >>> >>> It would solve any package name clashes without needing to call it >>> csv2 or whatever. >>> >> >> Yeah. How about Commons Solr. >> >> not serious of course. > > ROFL > > ;-)
Slightly more serious: Since CSV is currently only a single package with very few classes, would it perhaps be suitable as a part of an existing Commons component? For example, Codec? One could look on the parsing as decoding the input, and (at least some of) the formats as encoding. [This would solve the package name issue.] Just a thought. There are ways around the jar size if that is considered to be a problem (e.g. Net releases its FTP code as a separate jar as well as combined). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
