On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Damjan Jovanovic <damjan....@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Jul 23, 2012, at 21:19, Damjan Jovanovic <dam...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's been 3 years since Imaging 0.97 was released,
>>>> and many bugs have been fixed and many features added,
>>>> so I would like to release a long overdue Imaging 1.0.
>>>>
>>>> Imaging 1.0, RC2 is available for review here:
>>>>  http://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC2/
>>>>
>>>> Maven artifacts are here:
>>>>  http://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC2/maven
>>>>
>>>> Details of changes since 0.97 are in the release notes:
>>>>  http://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC2/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>>>>  http://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC2/site/changes-report.html
>>>>
>>>> I have tested this with JDK 1.6 using maven2.
>>>>
>>>> The tag is here:
>>>>  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/imaging/tags/IMAGING_1_0_RC2/
>>>>
>>>> Site:
>>>>  http://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC2/site/
>>>>
>>>> Clirr Report is irrelevant - there is no source/binary/semantic
>>>> compatibility with 0.97.
>>>
>>> Since this is 1.0, I am more concerned with getting the API right than
>>> compatibility with a sandbox version. My question therefore is: are
>>> you happy with the API?
>>>
>>> I am traveling ATM and cannot dig into my IDE.
>>>
>>> I took a peek at the reports and there are a lot of issues reported by
>>> FindBugs, PMD and so on. What is the plan there?
>>
>> The API is fine for now. It could use some improvements, but that's
>> something I'd rather leave for version 2.0.
>
> In that case, what timeframe are you thinking of for [imaging] v2?
>

Not long, maybe by the end of the year.

Damjan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to