On 24 July 2012 02:18, Damjan Jovanovic <dam...@apache.org> wrote: > It's been 3 years since Imaging 0.97 was released, > and many bugs have been fixed and many features added, > so I would like to release a long overdue Imaging 1.0. > > Imaging 1.0, RC2 is available for review here: > http://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC2/ > > Maven artifacts are here: > http://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC2/maven
Commons components must use Nexus for staging Maven artifacts (and can use it for non-Maven as well) > Details of changes since 0.97 are in the release notes: > http://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC2/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > http://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC2/site/changes-report.html I think the release notes need to make it very clear that Imaging is completely different from Sanselan. They need to describe the: - different package name - different Maven co-ordinates. > I have tested this with JDK 1.6 using maven2. > > The tag is here: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/imaging/tags/IMAGING_1_0_RC2/ > > Site: > http://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC2/site/ > > Clirr Report is irrelevant - there is no source/binary/semantic > compatibility with 0.97. Agreed. > RAT Report: > http://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC2/site/rat-report.html There are at least 3 package.html files without AL headers. > Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, Friday 27 July 2012 > at 02:00 GMT. > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... -1 > Thank you! > > Damjan Jovanovic > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
