Gary Gregory wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Jörg Schaible > <joerg.schai...@gmx.de>wrote: > >> sebb wrote:
[snip] >> > Unless there is a significant improvement across several Java >> > versions, I'm -1 on the change as the code is now more obscure. >> >> Done. >> >> Any comment on replacing the standard hex representation (i.e. lower case >> letters like JDK does)? > > > While semantically the same, I wonder if changing the output style will > surprise some users. I'm 50/50. > > >> Or further usage of JDK functionality? >> > > I think it has to be considered on a case by case basis if there are any > side-effects like the one above. This code is completely new for 3.2, so *now* is the time to decide ;-) - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
