I don't know if that matters but I got some problems with Java 8:
1. Jacoco crashed:
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483)
at
sun.instrument.InstrumentationImpl.loadClassAndStartAgent(InstrumentationImpl.java:386)
at
sun.instrument.InstrumentationImpl.loadClassAndCallPremain(InstrumentationImpl.java:401)
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Class java/util/UUID could not be
instrumented.
at
org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_6effb9e.core.runtime.ModifiedSystemClassRuntime.createFor(ModifiedSystemClassRuntime.java:138)
at
org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_6effb9e.core.runtime.ModifiedSystemClassRuntime.createFor(ModifiedSystemClassRuntime.java:99)
at
org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_6effb9e.PreMain.createRuntime(PreMain.java:55)
at org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_6effb9e.PreMain.premain(PreMain.java:47)
... 6 more
Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchFieldException: $jacocoAccess
at java.lang.Class.getField(Class.java:1690)
at
org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_6effb9e.core.runtime.ModifiedSystemClassRuntime.createFor(ModifiedSystemClassRuntime.java:136)
... 9 more
2. Two tests are failing:
Tests run: 5, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.001 sec <<<
FAILURE! - in org.apache.commons.math3.ml.neuralnet.NetworkTest
testIterationOrder(org.apache.commons.math3.ml.neuralnet.NetworkTest) Time
elapsed: 0.001 sec <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: null
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:86)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:52)
at
org.apache.commons.math3.ml.neuralnet.NetworkTest.testIterationOrder(NetworkTest.java:133)
Tests run: 48, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 1, Time elapsed: 22.278 sec <<<
FAILURE! - in org.apache.commons.math3.util.FastMathTest
checkMissingFastMathClasses(org.apache.commons.math3.util.FastMathTest) Time
elapsed: 0.011 sec <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: FastMath should implement all StrictMath methods
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
at
org.apache.commons.math3.util.FastMathTest.checkMissingFastMathClasses(FastMathTest.java:1109)
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 29/04/2014 22:07, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to call a vote to release Commons Math 3.3 based on RC1.
>
> Math 3.3 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/math/
> (svn revision 5199)
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1025/org/apache/commons/commons-math3/3.3/
>
> Details of changes since 3.2 are in the release notes:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/math/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC1/changes-report.html
>
> The tag is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_3_RC1
> (svn revision 1591059)
>
> Site:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC1/
> (note the apidocs for the 3.3 release will be added with the release)
>
> Clirr Report (compared to 3.2):
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC1/clirr-report.html
> (note that there are 4 false positives where the signature of a
> method has changed such that the parameter type is now the superclass of
> the previous type)
>
> RAT Report:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC1/rat-report.html
>
> Findbugs Report:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC1/findbugs.html
> (the listed error is a false positive, the relevant line has not
> changed since the last release and the floating point comparison should
> be correct in this case).
>
> KEYS:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. after 1000
> GMT 02-May 2014.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
