Le 29/04/2014 22:07, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
> Hi all,
> 
> I would like to call a vote to release Commons Math 3.3 based on RC1.
> 
>  Math 3.3 RC1 is available for review here:
>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/math/
>     (svn revision 5199)
> 
>  Maven artifacts are here:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1025/org/apache/commons/commons-math3/3.3/
> 
>  Details of changes since 3.2 are in the release notes:
>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/math/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>     http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC1/changes-report.html
> 
>  The tag is here:
>     https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_3_RC1
>     (svn revision 1591059)
> 
>  Site:
>     http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC1/
>   (note the apidocs for the 3.3 release will be added with the release)
> 
>  Clirr Report (compared to 3.2):
>     http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC1/clirr-report.html
>    (note that there are 4 false positives where the signature of a
> method has changed such that the parameter type is now the superclass of
> the previous type)
> 
>  RAT Report:
>     http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC1/rat-report.html
> 
>  Findbugs Report:
>     http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC1/findbugs.html
>   (the listed error is a false positive, the relevant line has not
> changed since the last release and the floating point comparison should
> be correct in this case).
> 
>   KEYS:
>   http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
> 
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. after 1000
> GMT 02-May 2014.
> 
>   [X] +1 Release these artifacts

It seems I forgot to put an entry in the changes.xml file announcing the
new spherical.oned and spherical.twod packages, despite I did update the
user guide :-( So this new feature does not appear in the release notes.
I don't think it is a blocker, and I will add an entry only if there is
a need to roll another RC.

I have fixed the false positive in findbugs and also two javadoc errors.
Here again this is not blocking.

So +1 for the release.

Luc

>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Thomas
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to