Le 29/04/2014 22:07, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : > Hi all, > > I would like to call a vote to release Commons Math 3.3 based on RC1. > > Math 3.3 RC1 is available for review here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/math/ > (svn revision 5199) > > Maven artifacts are here: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1025/org/apache/commons/commons-math3/3.3/ > > Details of changes since 3.2 are in the release notes: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/math/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC1/changes-report.html > > The tag is here: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_3_RC1 > (svn revision 1591059) > > Site: > http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC1/ > (note the apidocs for the 3.3 release will be added with the release) > > Clirr Report (compared to 3.2): > http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC1/clirr-report.html > (note that there are 4 false positives where the signature of a > method has changed such that the parameter type is now the superclass of > the previous type) > > RAT Report: > http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC1/rat-report.html > > Findbugs Report: > http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC1/findbugs.html > (the listed error is a false positive, the relevant line has not > changed since the last release and the floating point comparison should > be correct in this case). > > KEYS: > http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS > > Please review the release candidate and vote. > This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. after 1000 > GMT 02-May 2014. > > [X] +1 Release these artifacts
It seems I forgot to put an entry in the changes.xml file announcing the new spherical.oned and spherical.twod packages, despite I did update the user guide :-( So this new feature does not appear in the release notes. I don't think it is a blocker, and I will add an entry only if there is a need to roll another RC. I have fixed the false positive in findbugs and also two javadoc errors. Here again this is not blocking. So +1 for the release. Luc > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > > Best regards, > > Thomas > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
