On 04/30/2014 10:25 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 29/04/2014 22:07, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to call a vote to release Commons Math 3.3 based on RC1.
>>
>>  Math 3.3 RC1 is available for review here:
>>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/math/
>>     (svn revision 5199)
>>
>>  Maven artifacts are here:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1025/org/apache/commons/commons-math3/3.3/
>>
>>  Details of changes since 3.2 are in the release notes:
>>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/math/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>>     http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC1/changes-report.html
>>
>>  The tag is here:
>>     https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_3_RC1
>>     (svn revision 1591059)
>>
>>  Site:
>>     http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC1/
>>   (note the apidocs for the 3.3 release will be added with the release)
>>
>>  Clirr Report (compared to 3.2):
>>     http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC1/clirr-report.html
>>    (note that there are 4 false positives where the signature of a
>> method has changed such that the parameter type is now the superclass of
>> the previous type)
>>
>>  RAT Report:
>>     http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC1/rat-report.html
>>
>>  Findbugs Report:
>>     http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.3/RC1/findbugs.html
>>   (the listed error is a false positive, the relevant line has not
>> changed since the last release and the floating point comparison should
>> be correct in this case).
>>
>>   KEYS:
>>   http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>>
>> Please review the release candidate and vote.
>> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. after 1000
>> GMT 02-May 2014.
>>
>>   [X] +1 Release these artifacts
> 
> It seems I forgot to put an entry in the changes.xml file announcing the
> new spherical.oned and spherical.twod packages, despite I did update the
> user guide :-( So this new feature does not appear in the release notes.
> I don't think it is a blocker, and I will add an entry only if there is
> a need to roll another RC.
> 
> I have fixed the false positive in findbugs and also two javadoc errors.
> Here again this is not blocking.
> 
> So +1 for the release.

Hi Luc,

as you prefer. Creating new artifacts is not so much work, just the
waiting till the upload is complete is kind of annoying.

Thomas

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to