Perhaps if there are only a few breaking changes we could prioritize reviewing those first and leave the rest for 6.1. Alternatively, we could release what's available now as 6.0 and release all the patches in a couple months as 7.0.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > Le 19/02/2015 14:59, Ben McCann a écrit : > > > Mark, do any of your pending changes break binary compatibility? If so, > do > > you mind sharing which do and which don't. It could be nice to release a > > 6.0 now and then release a 6.1 with your changes and any bug fixes for > > issues discovered in 6.0 > > There are breaking changes like BCEL-209 that must be addressed now. > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- about.me/benmccann
