Why do you say users would have to rename all their import statements? Is there a patch pending that we're consider which would change the package name? I don't think there'd be any changes that be hard for end users to deal with that I'm aware of.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote: > 2015-02-19 16:06 GMT+01:00 Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org>: > > > Le 19/02/2015 15:17, Ben McCann a écrit : > > > Perhaps if there are only a few breaking changes we could prioritize > > > reviewing those first and leave the rest for 6.1. Alternatively, we > > could > > > release what's available now as 6.0 and release all the patches in a > > couple > > > months as 7.0. > > > > I wouldn't force our users to rename all their import statements in a > > couple of month as we release BCEL 7.0 with breaking changes because we > > didn't want to handle a known issue for BCEL 6.0. > > > > Let's settle this now. > > > > +1 > > > > > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > http://github.com/britter > -- about.me/benmccann
