Folks,
I take it from our collective lack of movement, that we are voting no,
and just not willing to say it. If that is the case, we should have the
courtesy to say no, and at least give closure.
dave
On 11/08/2015 02:14 PM, Dave Brosius wrote:
I have already merged the changes into master, and deleted the
gh-pages branch here
https://github.com/mebigfatguy/Naomi
I can add a pull request to Norm to accept these in his repository, if
you like.
On 11/08/2015 01:53 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
Phil:
I am not happy about proceeding, though, in the presence of the
-1
votes. We like to make decisions by consensus and while this is a
procedural decision and therefore subject to majority approval, I
would like to ask those who case negative votes to reconsider.
I have an counter proposal: how about addressing most of the concerns
first:
- merge the mavenisation cleanly, it is not asked too much to display
it in master not gh-pages
- add some samples to the readme
- adopt commons codestyle
If those 3 things are done by the submitters I personally would be very
reliefed (I still would not see a case to use it myself, but at least
we wont have any ground for the rockstar argument anymore). I am not
sure about the "incubator" argument, as I understood it, it is not
needed for IP clearance.
And given the vote already passed you can just make the above clean-up
in git(hub) and get it merged to the sandbox.
gruss
Bernd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
