On 11/22/15 8:47 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > The person who called the VOTE should tally it up and report here.
I did tally the VOTE. We had three -1 PMC Votes. I asked the -1s to reconsider and they did not change their votes. Technically, we could call it a pass and push forward, but I was not personally prepared to do that. I concluded that we did not have consensus to move forward directly into the Sandbox. I also stated that I do not have the cycles at this time to rejoin the Incubator PMC and initiate the process there. If someone else wants to do that, fine. Bottom line is the direct-to-sandbox approach failed to achieve consensus and we need someone to volunteer to take on the Incubator process for this if we want to get this code into Commons. Phil > > Gary > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 6:14 AM, Dave Brosius <dbros...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Folks, >> >> I take it from our collective lack of movement, that we are voting no, and >> just not willing to say it. If that is the case, we should have the >> courtesy to say no, and at least give closure. >> >> dave >> >> On 11/08/2015 02:14 PM, Dave Brosius wrote: >> >>> I have already merged the changes into master, and deleted the gh-pages >>> branch here >>> >>> https://github.com/mebigfatguy/Naomi >>> >>> >>> I can add a pull request to Norm to accept these in his repository, if >>> you like. >>> >>> >>> On 11/08/2015 01:53 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: >>> >>>> Phil: >>>> >>>>> I am not happy about proceeding, though, in the presence of the >>>>> >>>> -1 >>>> >>>>> votes. We like to make decisions by consensus and while this is a >>>>> procedural decision and therefore subject to majority approval, I >>>>> would like to ask those who case negative votes to reconsider. >>>>> >>>> I have an counter proposal: how about addressing most of the concerns >>>> first: >>>> >>>> - merge the mavenisation cleanly, it is not asked too much to display >>>> it in master not gh-pages >>>> - add some samples to the readme >>>> - adopt commons codestyle >>>> >>>> If those 3 things are done by the submitters I personally would be very >>>> reliefed (I still would not see a case to use it myself, but at least >>>> we wont have any ground for the rockstar argument anymore). I am not >>>> sure about the "incubator" argument, as I understood it, it is not >>>> needed for IP clearance. >>>> >>>> And given the vote already passed you can just make the above clean-up >>>> in git(hub) and get it merged to the sandbox. >>>> >>>> gruss >>>> Bernd >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
