On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/22/15 8:47 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > The person who called the VOTE should tally it up and report here. > > I did tally the VOTE. We had three -1 PMC Votes. I asked the -1s > to reconsider and they did not change their votes. Technically, we > could call it a pass and push forward, but I was not personally > prepared to do that. I concluded that we did not have consensus to > move forward directly into the Sandbox. I also stated that I do not > have the cycles at this time to rejoin the Incubator PMC and > initiate the process there. If someone else wants to do that, > fine. Bottom line is the direct-to-sandbox approach failed to > achieve consensus and we need someone to volunteer to take on the > Incubator process for this if we want to get this code into Commons. > Thanks for the refresher. Gary > > Phil > > > > Gary > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 6:14 AM, Dave Brosius <dbros...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> Folks, > >> > >> I take it from our collective lack of movement, that we are voting no, > and > >> just not willing to say it. If that is the case, we should have the > >> courtesy to say no, and at least give closure. > >> > >> dave > >> > >> On 11/08/2015 02:14 PM, Dave Brosius wrote: > >> > >>> I have already merged the changes into master, and deleted the gh-pages > >>> branch here > >>> > >>> https://github.com/mebigfatguy/Naomi > >>> > >>> > >>> I can add a pull request to Norm to accept these in his repository, if > >>> you like. > >>> > >>> > >>> On 11/08/2015 01:53 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > >>> > >>>> Phil: > >>>> > >>>>> I am not happy about proceeding, though, in the presence of the > >>>>> > >>>> -1 > >>>> > >>>>> votes. We like to make decisions by consensus and while this is a > >>>>> procedural decision and therefore subject to majority approval, I > >>>>> would like to ask those who case negative votes to reconsider. > >>>>> > >>>> I have an counter proposal: how about addressing most of the concerns > >>>> first: > >>>> > >>>> - merge the mavenisation cleanly, it is not asked too much to display > >>>> it in master not gh-pages > >>>> - add some samples to the readme > >>>> - adopt commons codestyle > >>>> > >>>> If those 3 things are done by the submitters I personally would be > very > >>>> reliefed (I still would not see a case to use it myself, but at least > >>>> we wont have any ground for the rockstar argument anymore). I am not > >>>> sure about the "incubator" argument, as I understood it, it is not > >>>> needed for IP clearance. > >>>> > >>>> And given the vote already passed you can just make the above clean-up > >>>> in git(hub) and get it merged to the sandbox. > >>>> > >>>> gruss > >>>> Bernd > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
