On 04/12/2017 02:56 PM, Gilles wrote: > Yes; and it is good per se, of course. Unforunately, it didn't change > the Commons Math issue: it's still unmaintained, and from what I observe > on JIRA, it's not going to improve with time (I said that much one year > ago and I was right, in hindsight).
Ok, then let's move commons-math to dormant and redirect the users to Hipparchus. > Last time I acted (to request a "git" repository from INFRA), you (IIRC, > pardon me if I'm wrong) complained ;-) that it had not been agreed upon... Wasn't this because you wanted to create a new component before considering other options like creating a submodule of an existing component? > Moreover, the lack of interest shown by the PMC > is a worrying indication that any further work can be doomed to not get the > minimal support for an official release, even if there would be no > "technical reason"[4] to prevent such release. I wouldn't worry about that, even if few members are actively contributing to the code there are enough people ready to review and vote on the releases. > [1] It's the right size and scope: I now agree with the PMC members who > did not see it useful to have its current modules as separate > components. Good, and it could be the same with CM for the parts that may not fit well in a separate component. > [5] As usual, sorry for the long email, but trying to keep messages > short does not seem to help either in conveying correctly what I > perceive as a need for PMC action... Thanks! Emmanuel Bourg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
