On 04/12/2017 05:29 PM, Gilles wrote: > Do you actually prefer advertizing a non-Apache project rather than > having the PMC support its own developers in any which way it could?
If nobody is able to maintain commons-math I have no objection recommending an alternative, especially one that is derived from commons-math, has the same license and an open development process. The minimal support you can expect from the PMC members is people voting on the releases, and if there is no show stopper like binary incompatibilities, awful regressions or improperly licensed code, the vote will be a non-issue. > How can you be so sure? The last releases did not elicit an awful lot > of votes; and that is for components that do not raise objections about > their mere existence. Give it a try? Emmanuel Bourg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
