> > Using RandomStringGenerator from RandomStringUtils sounds good, but > > implies adding a dependency to commons-lang (commons-text). > > I haven't understood it that way; IIRC it was suggested that "Commons > Text" would additionally provide the same easy-to-use API (alias > "RandomStringUtils") as is currently in "Commons Lang". > When available, "RandomStringUtils" will be deleted from the latter, > and users will have to modify their "import" statement.
Ok, that would be fine * RandomStringGenerator in commons-text * new RandomStringUtils in commons-text with different package using RandomStringGenerator * mark RandomStringUtils in commons-lang as deprecated * release commons-text * release commons-lang * later remove RSU from commons-lang Jan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
