On Sep 6, 2017 12:31, "Pascal Schumacher" <pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote:
I'm for keeping RandomStringUtils in lang (at least in 3.x). It has to stay in 3.x no matter what to maintain BC. Gary Am 06.09.2017 um 12:55 schrieb Rob Tompkins: > On Sep 6, 2017, at 3:34 AM, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Rob, >> >> Looking at frequency I think more number of requests coming >> for RandomStringUtils for its simplicity. >> >> RandomStringGenerator is strong , flexible but one can't use it quickly. >> Also I think this tool should belong in Commons text's arsenal. I'm not >> only moving RandomStringUtils to text but changing its core logic with >> using >> RandomStringGenerator which seems fair to me. So finally we should release >> text-1.2 rather doing rollback of deprecation and release lang 3.6.1, >> WDYT >> ? >> >> I definitely lean this direction, but if I recall correctly we drew “line > between [lang] and [text]” to be: a piece of functionality should go in > [lang] if the arbitrary java developer would probably want it, whereas text > is geared towards folks actually doing text manipulation [1]. > > Personally I’m a +0 to +1 on doing this, but I wanted to gauge other > folks’ thoughts here because I feel like we’re in that grey area here. That > said, I’m perfectly willing to roll a 1.2 [text] release. > > Cheers, > -Rob > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/a2urysnxvxihfoto > > Regards, >> Amey >> >> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017, 12:00 AM Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Sep 5, 2017, at 11:00 AM, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello Benedikt, >>>> >>>> How about we keep that deprecated in lang and release Text-1.2 ? >>>> >>> [snip] >>> >>> I’m on board with this if folks are complaining and the original intent >>> was to deprecate things in [lang]. Why not roll forward as opposed to >>> backwards? >>> >>> But, that opens the question: Is RandomStringUtils something that most >>> folks would want (i.e. should it be in [lang] or [text])? I think that >>> question is more the heart of the problem here. Either direction seems >>> reasonable to me. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> -Rob >>> >>> I will >>>> submit changes [1] related to this in fact i'm fixing couple of failing >>>> test cases ATM. If you are planning to release 3.6.1 just to remove >>>> deprecation and deprecate RandomStringUtils back in Lang - 3.7 I'm fine >>>> with that as well. >>>> >>>> [1]. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEXT-101 >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> >>>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> since we’re getting more and more requests about the deprecation of >>>>> RandomStringUtils, I’m thinking about releasing the current state of >>>>> the >>>>> master branch as 3.6.1. I may have time to push an RC sometime this >>>>> >>>> week. >>> >>>> So if you have some fixes you want to include, please do so now. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Benedikt >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
