Le jeu. 5 août 2021 à 01:46, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > On Wed, 4 Aug 2021 at 13:38, Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > Le mer. 4 août 2021 à 04:27, Matt Juntunen <matt.a.juntu...@gmail.com> a > > écrit : > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I apologize if this was resolved already and I missed it, but did we > > > land anywhere on the issue of whether or not to release binaries of > > > example code modules? I've included the example module binaries in > > > previous releases of numbers and geometry but I don't think that they > > > are actually useful just as binaries. Are we ok to just leave the > > > example modules as code included in the source release? Also, should > > > they be part of the deployed site or should that just be for the > > > public API portions? > > > > FTR, I quote the question raised in another thread where this issue > > was first mentioned: > > "[...] how can we release (some official version of) the project as source > > without also releasing the (convenience) binaries for everything?" > > The ASF releases source. > > Binaries are optional.
This has been stated in my quote (cf. "convenience"). The question is whether we want to complexify the release procedure in order to not build the binaries for some of the source. What's the gain for the RM/developers/users? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
