Le jeu. 5 août 2021 à 14:08, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> a écrit : > > I agree with Matt.
Nobody seems to disagree (about not providing convenience *binaries* of the examples). My point was that the examples _must_ be part of the (source) release (with the caveat that they are not subject to BC), in the same way that unit tests are, because they could sometimes exercise the code in a way which the unit tests do not. Maybe I misunderstood Matt's proposal, which I thought was was to not release the examples (i.e. leaving them out of the release branch). Regards, Gilles P.S. The issue of what should be on the web site and how to do it is independent of the original question. > > Gary > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2021, 07:26 Matt Juntunen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I think it is preferable to perform the release using only the public API > > > modules. The examples will be released in the source tarball. > > > > +1 > > > > > [...] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
