Ahhh... I see no that's just code for I don't have time, but these folks have 
shown interest ;-)

I'm happy to help make sure we hit this deadline, but I'm not driving it.

Ross

-----Original Message-----
From: Ulrich Stärk [mailto:u...@spielviel.de] 
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 1:50 PM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016

*Really* moving board@ to BCC ;)

You said you put people in contact with each other so I was under the 
impression you were actively part of a group driving this.

Jim, do you have any updates on the current status?

Cheers,

Uli

On 2015-03-12 21:40, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
> Moving board@ to BCC
> 
> I am *not* working on it. I have no idea who said I was (I do hope it 
> wasn't me!)
> 
> All I know is that Jim, David and Roberto are working on it, I don't 
> know how actively but it is now a priority.
> 
> I believe Jim is involved wearing his ComDev hat so (with his 
> agreement) you can look to him for those updates. David is wearing his infra 
> hat and Roberto wears his SF hat.
> 
> Ross
> 
> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft 
> Corporation
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: Ulrich Stärk 
> [mailto:u...@spielviel.de] Sent: Thursday, March 12,
> 2015 1:36 PM To: dev@community.apache.org Cc: bo...@apache.org 
> Subject: Re: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016
> 
> We reported about apache extras in September and November and both 
> times we were told that Jim, Ross, David and Roberto were working on 
> it. Some time in October David asked for feedback on a proof of concept, no 
> news since then.
> 
> Can you shed some light on who is driving this atm?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Uli
> 
> On 2015-03-12 21:22, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
>> Today Google announced that Google Code will be shutting down Jan 25, 2016.
>> 
>> We need to create a replacement for Apache-extras. Can we please make 
>> sure that progress on this is reported in the ComDev board report each 
>> quarter.
>> 
>> I suggest the starting point should be to expand discussions with 
>> SourceForge, they have offered neighborhoods in the past. David, with 
>> his infra hat, has been exploring options for download provision already 
>> (I'm not sure of the current status).
>> 
>> (and as a reminder, this is why we don't like to use services 
>> provided by external companies)
>> 
>> Ross
>> 
>> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft 
>> Corporation
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to