+1 for GitHub  - as Apache Extras are easily mini-communities of one
or two people and not as clear way in to contribute.


GitHub should seriously be considered. Making an apache-extras
organization there should be straight forward.

As for binaries - I found it very useful to use BinTray for Beanshell
- as I could do both Maven and regular downloads:

https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/beanshell/wiki/Download

On 12 March 2015 at 21:49, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote:
> I don't know the reasons for choosing SF, but I'd highly recommend
> putting serious consideration into GitHub. It's quite pleasant to work
> with, and although I'm not a part of the apache-extras, I think those
> who are would be quite satisfied with it (that's just my personal
> opinion, of course).
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 5:37 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
>> It is my understanding that moving to SF from Google Code is a ComDev
>> decision. I have interacted with SF and then brought the PoCs they've
>> done here, but AFAIK, no decision has been made.
>>
>> --David
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
>> <ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>> Ahhh... I see no that's just code for I don't have time, but these folks 
>>> have shown interest ;-)
>>>
>>> I'm happy to help make sure we hit this deadline, but I'm not driving it.
>>>
>>> Ross
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ulrich Stärk [mailto:u...@spielviel.de]
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 1:50 PM
>>> To: dev@community.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016
>>>
>>> *Really* moving board@ to BCC ;)
>>>
>>> You said you put people in contact with each other so I was under the 
>>> impression you were actively part of a group driving this.
>>>
>>> Jim, do you have any updates on the current status?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Uli
>>>
>>> On 2015-03-12 21:40, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
>>>> Moving board@ to BCC
>>>>
>>>> I am *not* working on it. I have no idea who said I was (I do hope it
>>>> wasn't me!)
>>>>
>>>> All I know is that Jim, David and Roberto are working on it, I don't
>>>> know how actively but it is now a priority.
>>>>
>>>> I believe Jim is involved wearing his ComDev hat so (with his
>>>> agreement) you can look to him for those updates. David is wearing his 
>>>> infra hat and Roberto wears his SF hat.
>>>>
>>>> Ross
>>>>
>>>> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft
>>>> Corporation
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Ulrich Stärk
>>>> [mailto:u...@spielviel.de] Sent: Thursday, March 12,
>>>> 2015 1:36 PM To: dev@community.apache.org Cc: bo...@apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016
>>>>
>>>> We reported about apache extras in September and November and both
>>>> times we were told that Jim, Ross, David and Roberto were working on
>>>> it. Some time in October David asked for feedback on a proof of concept, 
>>>> no news since then.
>>>>
>>>> Can you shed some light on who is driving this atm?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Uli
>>>>
>>>> On 2015-03-12 21:22, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
>>>>> Today Google announced that Google Code will be shutting down Jan 25, 
>>>>> 2016.
>>>>>
>>>>> We need to create a replacement for Apache-extras. Can we please make
>>>>> sure that progress on this is reported in the ComDev board report each 
>>>>> quarter.
>>>>>
>>>>> I suggest the starting point should be to expand discussions with
>>>>> SourceForge, they have offered neighborhoods in the past. David, with
>>>>> his infra hat, has been exploring options for download provision already 
>>>>> (I'm not sure of the current status).
>>>>>
>>>>> (and as a reminder, this is why we don't like to use services
>>>>> provided by external companies)
>>>>>
>>>>> Ross
>>>>>
>>>>> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft
>>>>> Corporation
>>>>>
>>>>>



-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718

Reply via email to