On 22 May 2015 at 16:26, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Sorry for top posting.

This needs a new thread please.
Probably also needs to be on a different mailing list, e.g. site-dev.

> Do we have a place to record problems with the new pages ?
>
> I just had a look at http://www.apache.org/foundation/ and the list
> of Directors is looking very unformatted (not in columns)

That is nothing to do with projects-new.a.o

> rgds
> jan i.
>
>
>
>
> On 22 May 2015 at 17:21, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 22 May 2015 at 07:04, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr> wrote:
>> > Le jeudi 21 mai 2015 11:38:05 sebb a écrit :
>> > [...]
>> >> > the only information that require manual entry is charter:
>> >> So where is the charter to be documented?
>> > "documented"?
>> > I don't understand the question
>>
>> I meant:
>>
>> Where is the charter recorded/written down/defined?
>>
>> > if I look at http://projects.apache.org/docs/pmc.html, every field can
>> be
>> > automatically filled with great precision (better precision than what
>> people
>> > can do)
>>
>> AFAIK the only fields that are currently recorded (documented) elsewere
>> are:
>>
>> asfext:name
>> asfext:chair
>> asfext:member
>> All the above can be extracted from committee-info.txt (which is the
>> official source for the info).
>>
>> asfext:pmc - requires special processing to derive this
>> foaf:homepage - ditto
>> asfext:charter - that should be available from the board meeting
>> minutes, but it is non-trivial to extract.
>>
>> > We just hav to decide where to write the remaining fields: there are a
>> lot of
>> > svn places available
>> > project.a.o then projects-new.a.o seems to be a good place to make
>> information
>> > central and let PMCs know they're part of projects directory
>> >
>> > the format question is just a detail (that has to be precised, of course)
>>
>> s/precised/defined/
>>
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >> >> Might be easier to use a Wiki page for that?
>> >> >
>> >> > it's temporary
>> >>
>> >> Even more reason to use the Wiki, surely?
>> > thinking at it, more than the About page, a Wiki could be a great place
>> to put
>> > documentation for PMCs on the topic
>>
>> Long-term documentation is fine in SVN/Git.
>> Wiki spaces are generally more useful for discussion and where 3rd
>> party input is welcomed.
>> But so long as the documentation can easily be found from the website,
>> I guess it could be on the Wiki.
>>
>> > then I just tried to find COMDEV wiki and use it
>> > found, ok: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/Index
>> > use, ko: how do I get karma?
>>
>> No idea, try filing an Infra JIRA.
>>
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Hervé
>>

Reply via email to