On 16 October 2015 at 21:08, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I feel confident that anybody objects to ambiguous information, and that no
> one will object to improvement.

I do object to conflating LDAP committee and PMC membership.
The two are completely distinct (although related).

This is why I changed the text to show LDAP committee rather than PMC
a while back.
At the time, the tool did not analyse the actual PMC membership, only LDAP.

However it does now, so the output shows them as distinct items.

The LDAP committee information is not really relevant to the board, so
could now be dropped from the report skeleton.

But I think it is completely wrong to imply that changes to the LDAP
committee group have any bearing on PMC membership.

> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *OFBiz Extensions Marketplace*
> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>
>> Although I acknowledge that the LDAP membership and the project membership
>> might be different in certain weird edge cases, for the purpose of actually
>> generating a board report, I find the current formatting confuses me Every
>> Single Time.
>>
>> Viz:
>>
>> ## PMC changes:
>>
>>  - Currently 10 PMC members.
>>  - No new PMC members added in the last 3 months
>>  - Last PMC addition was Jean-Fran=C3=A7ois Maury at Mon Apr 07 2014
>>
>> ## LDAP changes:
>>
>>  - Currently 26 committers and 10 committee group members.
>>  - No new committee group members added in the last 3 months
>>  - No new committers added in the last 3 months
>>  - Last committer addition was Lyor Goldstein at Thu Apr 30 2015
>>
>>
>>
>> So, I can tease out of that there's 26 committers, and 10 PMC members, and
>> the latest additions were Jean Francois on April 7, and Lyor on April 30.
>> The rest of that phrasing is confusing to me. committee vs committer and
>> LDAP vs ... whatever. Not sure.
>>
>> Does anybody object to me reformatting this a little, so that it won't
>> confuse me next month?
>>
>> --Rich
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
>> http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
>>

Reply via email to