On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 10:56 +0100, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 02/12/2016 10:50 AM, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On Sun, 2016-02-07 at 17:01 +0100, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > > Contributions, feedback, quality control etc are MOST WELCOME, > > > and > > > we're > > > only getting started with the proof-of-concept right now (as > > > found in > > > svn). Hopefully we'll have something stable and polished by the > > > end > > > of > > > February? :) > > > > I just ran into > > > > http://101.opensuse.org/ > > > > today, which is (more or less) the same idea but for the openSUSE > > Linux > > distribution. > > > > Might be useful to see how others approached this. > > Agreed, and I think this is also an excellent example that these > things > have a use case and can work while keeping it all very simple. I've > looked at it, and it seems to have roughly the same approach; Give a > short description, defer to someplace else for the actual work.
Right. As a minor difference, I see that the may the tasks are listed is minimal - just a title and then point to the Github issues. But they do have the advantage of supporting a single issue tracker. Robert
