I think the assumption that anyone is intending to violate the code of conduct is a bad one. Lets not make that assumption.
I think the problem is that *I* used the term "positive discrimination". That has led to an interpretation of someone elses words through a cloudy lens. Before making assumptions about that other persons intent you should listen to their words. Have you watched Joan's presentation? Ross ________________________________________ From: Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2019 10:32 AM To: dev@community.apache.org Subject: Re: Building and Sustaining Inclusive Communities (was: on "meritocracy") > I'm not going to (intentionally) actively discriminate for or against anyone. > But I will protect your right, as an individual, to do so as long as you > protect my right to help you achieve the > right balance in our broader communities by stamping out the existence of any > discrimination (positive or negative). > Community over code How do you square this with the code of conduct? In my reading, unless the discrimination threaded some extremely fine needle, it would be in violation and a good argument could be made for the defense of it being in violation as well. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
