On 30/03/2019 13.23, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Mar 30, 2019, at 1:32 PM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not going to (intentionally) actively discriminate for or against anyone.
But I will protect your right, as an individual, to do so as long as you
protect my right to help you achieve the
right balance in our broader communities by stamping out the existence of any
discrimination (positive or negative).
Community over code
How do you square this with the code of conduct? In my reading, unless
the discrimination threaded some extremely fine needle, it would be in
violation and a good argument could be made for the defense of it
being in violation as well.
Discrimination, by definition, is unjust, unwarranted or prejudicial.
We discriminate all day long in our every day life, it's fine, as long
as it serves a greater good (or our personal selves). I don't get to go
into your house without you inviting me in, you don't get to claim
social benefits while you have a job, I can't apply for TAC - all
perfectly valid, legal cases of discrimination, that would not violate
the CoC. It's more about the action and consequences than the
dichotomous definition of a term here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
