Hey,

this would probably be interesting for @Kai Wähner who is also kind of an 
Apache Guy (and wears an OSS Hat aswell!).

Julian

Am 07.10.19, 11:26 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:

    Hi all,
    
    They already changed the wording slightly ... now they write that Siemens 
MindSphere USES a lot of Open-Source software. 
    Still not happy with it being mentioned directly after the: "There are a 
lot of Open-Source platforms", but it sort of feels as if Siemens had pulled 
some strings to be mentioned here (The official Agenda doesn't even mention 
"Siemens" or "MindSphere")
    
    I just discussed this with my boss and I'll probably be going. 
    Would however be great to show up there with a little (or a big) Apache 
delegation. 
    The big commercial players could be showing up with quite a delegation.
    After all it's not about Apache PLC4X, but could involve a great portion of 
what Apache does. 
    And especially the Panel discussions about: 
    
    "Panel 2.2: Nurturing Open Source Communities
    In the backdrop of the increasing popularity and use of open source
    software, it is a paradox that many open source projects continue to
    struggle to sustain themselves. Remarkably, sustainability issues
    afflict not just the small and medium-sized project, but also some of
    the larger and well-known ones.
    The success of open source software initiatives often goes hand in
    hand with the success of their communities. So what are the success
    factors leading to a sustainable community? What are the key
    challenges open source projects face? More importantly, what can
    and should be done about the sustainability and funding issue?
    This session invites a brief discussion to identify key sustainability
    concerns, followed by two deeper debates on practical
    proposals/solutions to solve (i) Sustainability issues (ii) Funding
    issues. The session combines results and inputs from the
    Commission’s EU-FOSSA project and the Commission’s Open
    Source Observatory (OSOR)"
    
    "Panel 7: Improving openness, trust and security thanks to open
    source
    The advent of emerging technologies like Artificial Intelligence and
    block chain and the exponential increase on cybersecurity threats
    made the demand for security, trust and transparency in decision
    making as key priorities in designing ICT systems. Open source is seen
    as a mechanism to ensure such characteristics. The purpose of this
    session is to highlight the role of Open Source towards achieving
    security, trust and transparency in decision-making. What are the
    strengths but also what are the weaknesses and limitations? The
    session combines results and inputs from the Commission’s EUFOSSA project."
    
    Chris
    
    Am 07.10.19, 10:38 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de>:
    
        Hi all,
        
        sorry for being late to the party.
        I totally agree with all that has been written.
        And although I will not be able to participate I think we should work 
on having them correct that (on paper and in their minds).
        Probably we could even do that as an official statement of the ASF or 
use some contacts to other OSS initiatives.
        As I see that as a rather general matter to hijack "OSS".
        
        What do you think?
        
        Julian
        
        Am 06.10.19, 11:48 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" 
<christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:
        
            Hi Michael,
            
            Yes, that too was my impression. I remember the amount of work you 
put in here. But it seems that Siemens likes to appear open without actually 
being open for open source. That's why I contacted the organizers and tried to 
convince them to correct this paragraph and suffered that they invite tuely 
open open-source communities.
            
            I'll be discussing with my boss, if I can attend.
            
            Chris
            
            Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
            
            ________________________________
            From: Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org>
            Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2019 6:31:01 PM
            To: dev@community.apache.org <dev@community.apache.org>; Christofer 
Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>; i...@apache.org <i...@apache.org>
            Subject: Re: Workshop about the future of Open Source Software and 
Open Source Hardware
            
            Am 2019-10-05 um 17:20 schrieb Christofer Dutz:
            > Hi,
            >
            > Lukasz just posted this on the plc4x slack channel mainly because 
of Siemens’ attempt to appear open:
            > “There are also B2B Open Source platforms: Siemens’ MindSphere 
offers a managed open source Platform-as-a-Service for developing 
cross-platform applications” (Which it clearly is not).
            >
            > But when I read through the Agenda I think it might be a good 
idea to show up with a little Apache delegation:
            > 
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/workshop-about-future-open-source-software-and-open-source-hardware
            >
            > Seems to be not a Workshop where you are fuled up with some 
stuff, but where people come together to form the appearance of Open-Source in 
the Industry.
            
            This cannot be right/true. I have tried for more than a year to 
engage
            with DI (digital infrastructure) and utterly failed. My fellow 
coworker
            in Nuremberg told me that we (DI) don't want to engage with the OSS
            community at any kind of level. After that, I left the topic w/o any
            prosperity for the company and the OSS community.
            
            Michael
            
            
        
        
        
?B�KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB�?�?[��X��ܚX�K??K[XZ[?�?[�?][��X��ܚX�P?\?X�?K�ܙ�B��܈?Y??]?[ۘ[??��[X[�?�??K[XZ[?�?[�?Z?[???\?X�?K�ܙ�B�
    
    
?B�KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB�?�?[��X��ܚX�K??K[XZ[?�?[�?][��X��ܚX�P?\?X�?K�ܙ�B��܈?Y??]?[ۘ[??��[X[�?�??K[XZ[?�?[�?Z?[???\?X�?K�ܙ�B�

Reply via email to