That was my suspicion but i have no data on this yet. Which mob-spec version? I can verify.
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Becky Gibson wrote: > Just an FYI - I ran mobile-spec yesterday (using an older version) and I > only had one failure so maybe the issue is with the tests themselves. > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > On iOS just touch and hold, drag then copy :) > > > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Michal Mocny wrote: > > > > > Shaz how did you generate that text file output? Did you open remote > > > inspector and copy console output manually? > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com<javascript:;> > <javascript:;>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Tried mob-spec on an iPhone 3GS running 6.0.1 (to rule out any errors > > due > > > > to the new 6.1.2 update) - same number of errors as the previous two > > > > devices. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Shazron > > > > <shaz...@gmail.com<javascript:;> > > <javascript:;>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I tagged iOS 2.5.0rc1 but there are 22 mobile-spec failures (21 > > related > > > > to > > > > > filetransfer). I'll examine them tomorrow and fix for a re-tag. The > > > > > mobile-spec failures are attached as a text file. Tested on an > > iPhone 5 > > > > > with iOS 6.1.2 and iPhone 4 with iOS 5.1.1, exact same failures. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Herm Wong < > > kingoftheo...@hotmail.com <javascript:;><javascript:;> > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> webOS has been tagged 2.5.0rc1. > > > > >> > > > > >> > From: shaz...@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;> > > > > >> > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:46:08 -0800 > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Tag 2.5.0rc1? > > > > >> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Will do the same EOD today for Eye-Oh-Ess, wrapping things up. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Joe Bowser > > > > >> > <bows...@gmail.com<javascript:;> > > <javascript:;> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Gone through the same process with Fil. If we fail, we fail > > > > >> together!!!! > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Filip Maj > > > > >> > > <f...@adobe.com<javascript:;> > > <javascript:;>> > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > I've creatd the JIRA issues for 2.5.0rc1 tagging. > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > Also created a new "next" branch under the javascript and > > tagged > > > > >> 2.5.0rc1 > > > > >> > > > from that branch.. Hope I did it right :s > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > On 2/19/13 11:32 AM, "Brian LeRoux" > > > > >> > > > <b...@brian.io<javascript:;> > <javascript:;>> > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >>Sounds about right. Lets aim to get this thing tagged/bagged > > > > today. > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >>On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Filip Maj > > > > >> > > >><f...@adobe.com<javascript:;> > > <javascript:;> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >>> I fear change! But let's do it. > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> On 2/19/13 11:19 AM, "Joe Bowser" > > > > >> > > >>> <bows...@gmail.com<javascript:;> > > <javascript:;>> > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> >So, how does this work? Do we create the next branch now > > and > > > > >> throw > > > > >> > > >>> >things in that? > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
