I just generated the js from cordova-js on tag 2.5.0rc1 (hash
04e4ceafdcd59cdd937e873cc9006766c1e5940a) and I get the same results as
I've always had :/
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote:
> Using the JS built from cordova-js it's working fine...
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Could be the symbol mapping.
> > Using Safari 6 iPhone Simulator debugging -- window.FileTransfer is not
> > defined, but I can do a cordova.require("cordova/plugin/FileTransfer").
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Don't know what's wrong - with mob-spec 3e3d075 on iOS 2.5.0rc1 it
> still
> > > all fails. Trying iOS 2.4.0 (with latest mob-spec), it all passes. I
> > > suspect its in the cordova-js, not mob-spec
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Andrew, I re-verified and re-downloaded 2.5.0rc1 of iOS and 2.5.0rc1
> of
> > >> mobile-spec, created a new project - I get the same results as I had
> > (both
> > >> in Simulator and device as well).
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org
> > >wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Just tried the tests and they are all passing for me (on simulator)
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Becky Gibson <
> gibson.be...@gmail.com
> > >>> >wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > This morning I did git pull apache next for mobile-spec and got
> > this:
> > >>> > Updating 3e3d075..842e603
> > >>> > Fast-forward
> > >>> > VERSION | 2 +-
> > >>> > autotest/tests/file.tests.js | 14 ++++++++++----
> > >>> > autotest/tests/filetransfer.tests.js | 27
> > +++++++++++++++++++++------
> > >>> > cordova.js | 2 +-
> > >>> > index.html | 1 +
> > >>> > misc/index.html | 3 ++-
> > >>> > misc/page2.html | 27
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > >>> > splashscreen/index.html | 47
> > >>> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >>> > 8 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > >>> > create mode 100644 splashscreen/index.html
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Does that help?
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > That was my suspicion but i have no data on this yet. Which
> > >>> > > mob-spec version? I can verify.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Becky Gibson wrote:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > > Just an FYI - I ran mobile-spec yesterday (using an older
> > version)
> > >>> and
> > >>> > I
> > >>> > > > only had one failure so maybe the issue is with the tests
> > >>> themselves.
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com
> > >>> > > <javascript:;>>
> > >>> > > > wrote:
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > > On iOS just touch and hold, drag then copy :)
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Michal Mocny wrote:
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > Shaz how did you generate that text file output? Did you
> > open
> > >>> > remote
> > >>> > > > > > inspector and copy console output manually?
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Shazron <
> shaz...@gmail.com
> > >>> > > <javascript:;>
> > >>> > > > <javascript:;>>
> > >>> > > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > Tried mob-spec on an iPhone 3GS running 6.0.1 (to rule
> out
> > >>> any
> > >>> > > errors
> > >>> > > > > due
> > >>> > > > > > > to the new 6.1.2 update) - same number of errors as the
> > >>> previous
> > >>> > > two
> > >>> > > > > > > devices.
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Shazron <
> > shaz...@gmail.com
> > >>> > > <javascript:;>
> > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
> > >>> > > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > I tagged iOS 2.5.0rc1 but there are 22 mobile-spec
> > >>> failures (21
> > >>> > > > > related
> > >>> > > > > > > to
> > >>> > > > > > > > filetransfer). I'll examine them tomorrow and fix for a
> > >>> re-tag.
> > >>> > > The
> > >>> > > > > > > > mobile-spec failures are attached as a text file.
> Tested
> > >>> on an
> > >>> > > > > iPhone 5
> > >>> > > > > > > > with iOS 6.1.2 and iPhone 4 with iOS 5.1.1, exact same
> > >>> > failures.
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Herm Wong <
> > >>> > > > > kingoftheo...@hotmail.com <javascript:;><javascript:;>
> > >>> > > > > > > >wrote:
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > >> webOS has been tagged 2.5.0rc1.
> > >>> > > > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > From: shaz...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:46:08 -0800
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Tag 2.5.0rc1?
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > >>> <javascript:;>
> > >>> > > > > > > >> >
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > Will do the same EOD today for Eye-Oh-Ess, wrapping
> > >>> things
> > >>> > up.
> > >>> > > > > > > >> >
> > >>> > > > > > > >> >
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Joe Bowser <
> > >>> > > bows...@gmail.com<javascript:;>
> > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > > > > > > >> >
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > Gone through the same process with Fil. If we
> fail,
> > >>> we
> > >>> > fail
> > >>> > > > > > > >> together!!!!
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Filip Maj <
> > >>> > f...@adobe.com
> > >>> > > <javascript:;>
> > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
> > >>> > > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > I've creatd the JIRA issues for 2.5.0rc1
> tagging.
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > Also created a new "next" branch under the
> > >>> javascript
> > >>> > and
> > >>> > > > > tagged
> > >>> > > > > > > >> 2.5.0rc1
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > from that branch.. Hope I did it right :s
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > On 2/19/13 11:32 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io
> > >>> > > <javascript:;>
> > >>> > > > <javascript:;>>
> > >>> > > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>Sounds about right. Lets aim to get this thing
> > >>> > > tagged/bagged
> > >>> > > > > > > today.
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Filip Maj <
> > >>> > > f...@adobe.com<javascript:;>
> > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> I fear change! But let's do it.
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> On 2/19/13 11:19 AM, "Joe Bowser" <
> > >>> bows...@gmail.com
> > >>> > > <javascript:;>
> > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
> > >>> > > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >So, how does this work? Do we create the next
> > >>> branch
> > >>> > > now
> > >>> > > > > and
> > >>> > > > > > > >> throw
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >things in that?
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >
> > >>> > > > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
