Could be the symbol mapping.
Using Safari 6 iPhone Simulator debugging -- window.FileTransfer is not
defined, but I can do a cordova.require("cordova/plugin/FileTransfer").On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Don't know what's wrong - with mob-spec 3e3d075 on iOS 2.5.0rc1 it still > all fails. Trying iOS 2.4.0 (with latest mob-spec), it all passes. I > suspect its in the cordova-js, not mob-spec > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Andrew, I re-verified and re-downloaded 2.5.0rc1 of iOS and 2.5.0rc1 of >> mobile-spec, created a new project - I get the same results as I had (both >> in Simulator and device as well). >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>wrote: >> >>> Just tried the tests and they are all passing for me (on simulator) >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Becky Gibson <gibson.be...@gmail.com >>> >wrote: >>> >>> > This morning I did git pull apache next for mobile-spec and got this: >>> > Updating 3e3d075..842e603 >>> > Fast-forward >>> > VERSION | 2 +- >>> > autotest/tests/file.tests.js | 14 ++++++++++---- >>> > autotest/tests/filetransfer.tests.js | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------ >>> > cordova.js | 2 +- >>> > index.html | 1 + >>> > misc/index.html | 3 ++- >>> > misc/page2.html | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++----- >>> > splashscreen/index.html | 47 >>> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> > 8 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >>> > create mode 100644 splashscreen/index.html >>> > >>> > Does that help? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > > That was my suspicion but i have no data on this yet. Which >>> > > mob-spec version? I can verify. >>> > > >>> > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Becky Gibson wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > Just an FYI - I ran mobile-spec yesterday (using an older version) >>> and >>> > I >>> > > > only had one failure so maybe the issue is with the tests >>> themselves. >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com >>> > > <javascript:;>> >>> > > > wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > > On iOS just touch and hold, drag then copy :) >>> > > > > >>> > > > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Michal Mocny wrote: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > Shaz how did you generate that text file output? Did you open >>> > remote >>> > > > > > inspector and copy console output manually? >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com >>> > > <javascript:;> >>> > > > <javascript:;>> >>> > > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Tried mob-spec on an iPhone 3GS running 6.0.1 (to rule out >>> any >>> > > errors >>> > > > > due >>> > > > > > > to the new 6.1.2 update) - same number of errors as the >>> previous >>> > > two >>> > > > > > > devices. >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com >>> > > <javascript:;> >>> > > > > <javascript:;>> >>> > > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > I tagged iOS 2.5.0rc1 but there are 22 mobile-spec >>> failures (21 >>> > > > > related >>> > > > > > > to >>> > > > > > > > filetransfer). I'll examine them tomorrow and fix for a >>> re-tag. >>> > > The >>> > > > > > > > mobile-spec failures are attached as a text file. Tested >>> on an >>> > > > > iPhone 5 >>> > > > > > > > with iOS 6.1.2 and iPhone 4 with iOS 5.1.1, exact same >>> > failures. >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Herm Wong < >>> > > > > kingoftheo...@hotmail.com <javascript:;><javascript:;> >>> > > > > > > >wrote: >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> webOS has been tagged 2.5.0rc1. >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> > From: shaz...@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;> >>> > > > > > > >> > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:46:08 -0800 >>> > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Tag 2.5.0rc1? >>> > > > > > > >> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org <javascript:;> >>> <javascript:;> >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > Will do the same EOD today for Eye-Oh-Ess, wrapping >>> things >>> > up. >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Joe Bowser < >>> > > bows...@gmail.com<javascript:;> >>> > > > > <javascript:;> >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > > Gone through the same process with Fil. If we fail, >>> we >>> > fail >>> > > > > > > >> together!!!! >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Filip Maj < >>> > f...@adobe.com >>> > > <javascript:;> >>> > > > > <javascript:;>> >>> > > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > > >> > > > I've creatd the JIRA issues for 2.5.0rc1 tagging. >>> > > > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > Also created a new "next" branch under the >>> javascript >>> > and >>> > > > > tagged >>> > > > > > > >> 2.5.0rc1 >>> > > > > > > >> > > > from that branch.. Hope I did it right :s >>> > > > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > On 2/19/13 11:32 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io >>> > > <javascript:;> >>> > > > <javascript:;>> >>> > > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>Sounds about right. Lets aim to get this thing >>> > > tagged/bagged >>> > > > > > > today. >>> > > > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Filip Maj < >>> > > f...@adobe.com<javascript:;> >>> > > > > <javascript:;> >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> I fear change! But let's do it. >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> On 2/19/13 11:19 AM, "Joe Bowser" < >>> bows...@gmail.com >>> > > <javascript:;> >>> > > > > <javascript:;>> >>> > > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >So, how does this work? Do we create the next >>> branch >>> > > now >>> > > > > and >>> > > > > > > >> throw >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >things in that? >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >> >> >
