Andrew, I re-verified and re-downloaded 2.5.0rc1 of iOS and 2.5.0rc1 of mobile-spec, created a new project - I get the same results as I had (both in Simulator and device as well).
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: > Just tried the tests and they are all passing for me (on simulator) > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Becky Gibson <gibson.be...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > This morning I did git pull apache next for mobile-spec and got this: > > Updating 3e3d075..842e603 > > Fast-forward > > VERSION | 2 +- > > autotest/tests/file.tests.js | 14 ++++++++++---- > > autotest/tests/filetransfer.tests.js | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------ > > cordova.js | 2 +- > > index.html | 1 + > > misc/index.html | 3 ++- > > misc/page2.html | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++----- > > splashscreen/index.html | 47 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 8 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 splashscreen/index.html > > > > Does that help? > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > That was my suspicion but i have no data on this yet. Which > > > mob-spec version? I can verify. > > > > > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Becky Gibson wrote: > > > > > > > Just an FYI - I ran mobile-spec yesterday (using an older version) > and > > I > > > > only had one failure so maybe the issue is with the tests themselves. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On iOS just touch and hold, drag then copy :) > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Michal Mocny wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Shaz how did you generate that text file output? Did you open > > remote > > > > > > inspector and copy console output manually? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com > > > <javascript:;> > > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tried mob-spec on an iPhone 3GS running 6.0.1 (to rule out any > > > errors > > > > > due > > > > > > > to the new 6.1.2 update) - same number of errors as the > previous > > > two > > > > > > > devices. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com > > > <javascript:;> > > > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tagged iOS 2.5.0rc1 but there are 22 mobile-spec failures > (21 > > > > > related > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > filetransfer). I'll examine them tomorrow and fix for a > re-tag. > > > The > > > > > > > > mobile-spec failures are attached as a text file. Tested on > an > > > > > iPhone 5 > > > > > > > > with iOS 6.1.2 and iPhone 4 with iOS 5.1.1, exact same > > failures. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Herm Wong < > > > > > kingoftheo...@hotmail.com <javascript:;><javascript:;> > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> webOS has been tagged 2.5.0rc1. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > From: shaz...@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;> > > > > > > > >> > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:46:08 -0800 > > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Tag 2.5.0rc1? > > > > > > > >> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > Will do the same EOD today for Eye-Oh-Ess, wrapping things > > up. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Joe Bowser < > > > bows...@gmail.com<javascript:;> > > > > > <javascript:;> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > Gone through the same process with Fil. If we fail, we > > fail > > > > > > > >> together!!!! > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Filip Maj < > > f...@adobe.com > > > <javascript:;> > > > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > I've creatd the JIRA issues for 2.5.0rc1 tagging. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Also created a new "next" branch under the javascript > > and > > > > > tagged > > > > > > > >> 2.5.0rc1 > > > > > > > >> > > > from that branch.. Hope I did it right :s > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > On 2/19/13 11:32 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io > > > <javascript:;> > > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>Sounds about right. Lets aim to get this thing > > > tagged/bagged > > > > > > > today. > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >>On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Filip Maj < > > > f...@adobe.com<javascript:;> > > > > > <javascript:;> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> I fear change! But let's do it. > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> On 2/19/13 11:19 AM, "Joe Bowser" < > bows...@gmail.com > > > <javascript:;> > > > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> >So, how does this work? Do we create the next > branch > > > now > > > > > and > > > > > > > >> throw > > > > > > > >> > > >>> >things in that? > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >